In case you are questioning whether or not you can do good PDF to Word (DOC, DOCX, or RTF) conversion for free, the answer is: Absolutely. This posting will current and examine a number of alternative ways to do this, for free, without any watermarks or restrictions.
This is our fourth replace of this article, which we consider to be the most effective important overview of TRULY free PDF to Word instruments on the web. With every update, a slew of instruments are added and a variety of the previous ones removed, both as a result of they not supply a FREE service, or as a result of they have been outmoded by newer tools which are simply higher high quality. Final up to date: Oct 7th 2013.
There are two kinds of instruments out there to users: free desktop packages that can convert PDF to Word, and free online conversion providers. Word that our focus on this article will probably be on those providers that provide the very best high quality. In making this article we examined more than thirty instruments, of which we determined to embrace sixteen totally different tools here; 5 desktop-based apps and 11 on-line conversion providers.
Here’s fast table of contents (click on any hyperlink to leap to that section):
- 1 The listing of free PDF to Word instruments:
- 2 Necessary issues and questions to tackle:
- 3 General Comparison: which software(s) are one of the best:
- 4 Eliminated/excluded providers:
- 5 1. An inventory of the free PDF-to-Word conversion tools mentioned in this article
- 6 2. Necessary points and questions to handle
- 7 three. General Comparison: which device(s) are the perfect
- 8 3.1 The Verdict
- 9 3.2 Text Dealing with
- 10 3.3 Picture Handling
- 11 three.4 Desk Dealing with
- 12 three.5 Reliability and most file sizes
- 13 3.6 OCR Help
- 14 4. Eliminated/Excluded Providers
The listing of free PDF to Word instruments:
Desktop apps and online providers both.
Necessary issues and questions to tackle:
E.g will I give you the chance to edit the resulting doc?, what is the distinction between desktop and on-line tools?, and so forth.
General Comparison: which software(s) are one of the best:
An general comparison desk and verdict section, but in addition we present more in-depth comparisons broken down into the next sub-criteria Textual content Handling | Image Handling | Table Dealing with | Reliability and maximum file sizes | and OCR help.
These tools have been removed from earlier versions of this article or have been too low high quality to make the minimize.
1. An inventory of the free PDF-to-Word conversion tools mentioned in this article
We’ll examine 16 tools, 5 desktop apps and 11 on-line conversion providers. You’ll be able to see a complete comparison of these in our ‘Overall Comparison’ table. Or go to the Verdict section which ranks all of the instruments and hyperlinks out to an summary page for each (together with sections for individual strengths/weaknesses and obtain hyperlinks).
(Home windows; Mac; Linux)
(Windows; Mac; Linux)
2. Necessary points and questions to handle
Before I transfer on to the comparison part, some questions that I am incessantly requested about.
What codecs can I convert to? Any of the following: .DOC, .DOCX, or .RTF; which is to say something that MS Word can read (you’ll be able to subsequently save to no matter format you like).
Do all tools talked about on this article convert to one in every of these formats? No. We figured the point was to permit you to edit your PDF, and actually two of the instruments right here (LibreOffice and OpenOffice) do not convert your PDF in any respect. The rationale we included them is that they may allow you to open a PDF (in the ‘drawing’ element of the suite and not the phrase processor) and edit then reserve it immediately, which for many people may be sufficient and even preferable to changing to a Word format.
Are the instruments talked about really free? Yes. All of those are free. Some of them are free variations of more souped up merchandise which are paid, but they should find a way to deliver the PDF to Word conversion functionality (without restrictions, trial durations, or watermarks) in order to be included on this article.
Please Observe: it is attainable that the free version of one or more instruments might have been removed by the builders subsequent to the final replace of this text, during which case please let us know so we will take away it.
Are free tools nearly as good as paid instruments? This website known as ‘Freewaregenius’ and we solely take a look at free packages and instruments, so we don’t understand how properly paid instruments fare in comparison. However we are adamant that you would be able to get a superb PDF to Word conversion using all free instruments (especially those that came out most extremely ranking in our comparison).
On-line vs. desktop converters: desktop based mostly converters are packages you install in your machine and that carry out the conversion regionally and immediately. On-line instruments are net providers which you could upload your file to and then obtain the end result (or get it by e mail).
Some great benefits of using a desktop app contain NOT having to upload your file and wait. Uploading very giant information may be very inconvenient in case your information are giant or when you have many information to convert. Desktop apps are extra handy for batch conversions and are extra simple to use.
One the other hand, it’s usually the case that free online conversion providers are extra refined than free desktop converters and should supply a larger high quality conversion, though depending on your doc which will or will not be the case. Two issues which have to be thought-about with online conversions are reliability and safety: how long will it take to get my transformed doc? Whereas most on-line providers will ship your converted document within a matter of minutes, it’s typically the case that your file will arrive hours and even days afterwards. As for the latter concern (security), nearly all the online providers mentioned right here promise that your information can be transferred by way of a secure connection, that your doc won’t be looked at by a human, and that your e mail won’t be used or shared with another celebration. Still, it is up to you to determine whether you’re snug importing some personal or business paperwork over the internet to a remote server for conversion.
If you realize for positive that you really want a desktop-based converter and are not looking for to upload information online, then we advocate that you simply use UniPDF, which is one of the best desktop-based software talked about on this article.
Will the doc be editable as soon as it’s transformed?: sometimes, sure; nevertheless the actual reply is it will depend on your unique doc and the way it was created. Usually speaking it is possible for you to to edit any converted PDF that was created electronically and revealed using software program, which includes the overwhelming majority of types and paperwork which are on the web. The exception is that if your PDF was scanned from a paper doc; in this case most converters will contemplate this to be no totally different from a photograph, and when converting will produce photographs inside a .DOC file moderately than textual content. What you need on this case is “Optical Character Recognition” (OCR) software program, or a converter than can do OCR (two choices mentioned on this article can do OCR; NuancePDF and Convert.information, both on-line converters); in any other case you possibly can take a look at our listing of free OCR instruments. These packages can “read” photographs and convert them to textual content, but for paperwork with a giant variety of pages it may be somewhat labor intensive to get a good conversion.
Will any of these convert special characters, mathematical notation, and so forth.: many will, but with numerous levels of accuracy. Some instruments are intelligent enough to deal with the inverted left-to-right course involved in scripts comparable to Arabic or Hebrew and the render ‘connected’ letters fairly than separate ones as applicable, while others will not be. While we now have a column in our comparison table that provides you some concept about special character help, we aren’t specialists on this and on the finish of the day you’ll have to attempt them out for your self.
Converting to pictures: in case you are focused on changing your PDF to photographs then you definitely’re in the improper place. For this you possibly can attempt the the superb free PDF reader referred to as PDF X-Change Viewer which has an export to pictures choice.
Documents used within the PDF-to-Word conversion exams: we transformed a dozen totally different paperwork meant to check numerous elements (e.g. very giant documents, varieties with a lot of tables, a scanned PDF to check for OCR, a trade brochure sort doc with columns and pictures, and so forth.) An earlier incarnation of this article listed all the documents utilized in a table, but we removed this to make the article smaller.
three. General Comparison: which device(s) are the perfect
It relies upon enormously on what you want it to do and in your unique PDF. We’ll price the conversion tools based mostly on the next:
- Conversion quality: particularly, their dealing with of Text, Photographs, and Tables within the transformed doc
- Other options: which are Reliability (a.okay.a can I get a respectable wanting conversion shortly with out leaping via too many hoops), OCR (optical character recognition) help, and max file measurement help for each device.
The following table presents an general comparison/summary. We’ll use a easy 4-point score system ( A / B / C and D ) the place ‘A’ is greatest and ‘D’ is worst. We may even colour co-ordinate outcomes in order that you would learn evaluations at a glance (green/orange/pink as proven). The ultimate (general) score column will include three extra values ( A+ , B+ , and C+ ), so as to make finer distinctions).
|On-line v.||Dealing with of||Other Features||General|
|Desktop||Textual content||Pictures||Tables||Reliability||Max file|
|Free PDF to Word Converter from SmartSoft||Windows||C||B||B||A||No limit||No||B|
sluggish to load “Optical Character Recognition”
|OpenOffice with PDF import extension||Home windows;|
sluggish to load “Optical Character Recognition”
|PDFMate Converter free||Home windows||D||D||C||A||No limit||No||C|
|NuancePDF||Online||B||A||A||A||10 MB “Optical Character Recognition”||Yes||A+|
|PDF to Word Free from NitroPDF||On-line||B||A||A||A||5 MB or 50|
pages per file
|EasyPDF Cloud||On-line||A||A||A||B||2 MB||No||A|
|ConvertPDFtoWord.internet||On-line||D||C||C||B||> 12 MB “Optical Character Recognition”||No||C|
|Pdfburger||Online||B||A||B||A||> 12 MB “Optical Character Recognition”||No||B+|
|“Optical Character Recognition” For more info on these knowledge factors refer to the ‘Reliability and max file measurement’ comparison table under.|
3.1 The Verdict
Finally, there are three tiers of tools: those which might be wonderful/extremely beneficial, these which might be good, and people who we do NOT advocate. Please word that we number the instruments under (1 by way of 16) based mostly on our choice, with the tools we like greatest on prime.
Tier 1 PDF to Word conversion instruments: these are extremely advisable
- UniPDF ( A+ ): Desktop software (Windows). That is the perfect desktop-based converter, is technically wonderful, and will be the most popular device for most readers (until they don’t seem to be Windows users, or until they require OCR help, which it does not help).
- ConvertOnlineFree.com ( A+ ): On-line device. May be the most effective general conversion device (esp. with help for giant information up to 30 gigs). We advocate we use this one in case you don’t thoughts an internet device, until you need OCR help, which it lacks.
- NuancePDF ( A+ ): Online device, with a required desktop element. Not simply wonderful all-around conversion, but presents OCR help to boot (and one of the best OCR out of the 2 instruments talked about here that have it). Notice: OCR help is uncommon in a free converter and makes me place this high up the ranlings.
- Convert.Information ( A+ ): Online device. Combines wonderful all-around conversion with OCR help. Notice: OCR help is rare in a free converter and makes me place this excessive up the ranlings.
- PDFOnline.com ( A ): On-line software. A superb PDF to Word converter. No OCR help. Might have been higher with out the two MB max file measurement restriction.
- EasyPDF Cloud ( A ): Online software. Actually, a rebranded version of PDFOnline.com (above) with the same execs and cons.
- Free PDF to Word Converter from SmartSoft ( B ): Desktop device (Home windows). Makes it into our tier 1 record of tools because it’s the second greatest FREE desktop based mostly converter, and since good desktop converters are a bit of a rarity. We also assume that some individuals wouldn’t want an internet converter it doesn’t matter what. It does a very respectable job and is a wonderful common use choice.
- PDF to Word Free from NitroPDF ( A ): On-line device. An excellent converter that may deliver. Is available in at this slot solely as a result of it trails barely behind those greater up.
Tier 2 PDF to Word conversion tools: good instruments
- Pdfconverter.com ( B+ ): Online device. One other wonderful converter, though because it trails barely behind those above it turns into somewhat of a ‘me too’ software in a crowded area..
- Pdfburger ( B+ ): On-line device. A very competent and good quality converter which allows uploading of information larger than 10 MB. Additionally trails slightly behind those greater on this record, and in addition is sort of a ‘me too’ software in a crowded class..
- OpenOffice with PDF import extension ( C+ ): Desktop device. Does not convert to Word format, however will let you open, edit and save your PDF instantly. Appropriate for making small edits on small information.
- LibreOffice ( C+ ): Desktop device. LibreOffice is predicated on OpenOffice and like that one it does not convert to Word format, however will let you open, edit and save your PDF immediately. Suitable for making small edits on small information.
Tier three PDF to Word conversion instruments: NOT beneficial
- PDFMate Converter Free ( C ): Desktop device. That is a new entrant which I added to this text lately. I had excessive hopes that it will be a actually good desktop converter because I needed more of those (provided that there are such a lot of good online converters). Alas, it wasn’t.
- Zamzar ( C ): Online software. Although it’s PDF to Word conversion seems to be respectable at first glance, technically it is likely one of the weakest on-line instruments here and cuts a lot of corners.
- Fileminx ( C ): Online device. One of many weakest online tools in a subject that has some really good performers, lands this a tier 3 ranking.
- ConvertPDFtoWord.internet ( C ): On-line software. Gets my nomination for the weakest online PDF to Word conversion software.
3.2 Text Dealing with
There are a number of elements that affect text dealing with, however I’ll say this: all of those instruments will convert textual content kind of satisfactorily for most PDFs. There are some documents the place for some cause or one other textual content accuracy might be variable across the totally different instruments, but these are comparatively rare.
We evaluate/examine at text dealing with throughout the following elements: Text Move (i.e. how straightforward it is to edit or work with the ensuing text), Text Accuracy (will there be a trustworthy conversion?, or will the ensuing text be glitchy), help for special characters (which can be essential for some), and whether or not the transformed document will retain hyperlinks which will exist within the unique PDF.
(textual content bins) however text selectable nonetheless
(textual content packing containers)
(textual content packing containers)
(text packing containers)
[expand title=”Click to see an in-depth explanation of TEXT HANDLING evaluation criteria” tag=”h5″ trigclass=”bazinga” swaptitle=”Evaluation Criteria Explained / Text Handling”]Textual content Move: steady vs. interrupted
- Assuming you’re changing a PDF to Word in order to have the ability to edit it, it might be a lot easier if the textual content flowed constantly and was not interrupted by carriage returns or was dispersed across many separate text packing containers.
- Subsequently, for each of the instruments being thought-about we famous down whether or not the text was steady or interrupted (and whether or not it was interrupted by carriage returns or text bins).
- Importance: we thought this was an essential problem and gave it a lot of weight when score the varied instruments.
- Examples: click on under to see side-by-side examples of text that flows constantly, text that’s interrupted by carriage returns, or dispersed across floating textual content bins.
Textual content Accuracy: reliably accurate vs. less correct
- This sometimes will differ relying in your source PDF, however typically the fidelity of the text within the converted file is problematic.
- This could take two varieties: all-out gibberish the place you’re supposed to have textual content, or issues in rendering the right case, such that the words have lowercase/uppercase characters strewn about seemingly at random, forcing the consumer to manually right it (which may be labor intensive for giant documents).
- Significance: we thought this concern was relatively minor, because the inaccuracies, once they occurred, occurred in about one out of ten or so of paperwork that we tested only. Most paperwork converted just positive.
- Examples: click under to see side-by-side examples of accurate text appropriately rendered vs. gibberish, or textual content appropriately rendered vs. textual content with incorrect letter instances.
Special Character help: not one thing everybody will need, however read on for those who do
- Our evaluation of special character help is considerably cursory; we solely checked out whether or not special characters have been displayed, and whether or not the right-to-left inversion in some languages (similar to Arabic letters or Hebrew) was revered.
- We made three sorts of judgments: good (displays special characters most of the time and inverts left-to-right when applicable), dangerous (shows special characters a number of the time and/or doesn’t invert), and nonexistent (doesn’t show particular characters). We chose not to make extra refined evaluations. There’s a lot of variability with this concern and we are not any specialists; readers may have to check the varied options for themselves to see what works greatest.
- Importance: we thought this challenge was minor, though we understand that for some it’s of great importance.
- Examples: click under to see side-by-side examples of particular characters appropriately rendered vs. rendered without left to proper inversion vs. not displayed in any respect.
Preserves Hyperlinks: lively vs. Inactive
- You care about this if your unique PDF accommodates hyperlinks that you desire to preserved in the Word doc.
- This may be especially essential for net documents and for ebooks, where the index in many instances accommodates links into the e book itself or it might include hyperlinks to the online.
- Significance: we thought this concern was moderately essential, as a result of PDF paperwork are more and more built-in with the online.
- Examples: click under to see side-by-side examples of transformed paperwork with hyperlinks preserved and lively in one document, and rendered inactive in another.
3.3 Picture Handling
Belongings you need to find out about image rendering:
- Formatting in the unique PDF (such as the background shading of the document for example) is reworked into photographs when changing to Word.
- We consider image conversion throughout two criteria: whether or not the resulting photographs are distinct or lumped together, and the fidelity and placement of the resulting photographs, which is roughly a measure of the quality of the resulting image (and whether or not the pictures within the output are positioned where they need to be).
vs. lumped together
|Fidelity of Image||Score|
|Examples / Screenshots||Show Me||Present Me|
|Free PDF to Word Converter from SmartSoft||Distinct pictures||Good Picture rendering usually however variable. Pictures can typically be sliced into several pieces and onerous to use.||B|
|LibreOffice||Distinct photographs||Good Image rendering usually however variable. Photographs can typically be sliced into several pieces and exhausting to use or distorted.||B|
|OpenOffice with PDF import extension||Distinct photographs||Good Image rendering usually but variable. Pictures can typically be sliced into several items and arduous to use or distorted.||B|
|PDFMate Converter free||Variable; photographs typically lumped together, typically distinct.||Image rendering satisfactory however typically low high quality. Will typically render incorrect ‘background formatting’ photographs.||D|
|UniPDF||Distinct, but adjoining pictures are possible to be mixed together||Right rendering and placement of photographs||A|
|NuancePDF||Distinct, but adjacent photographs are doubtless to be combined collectively||Right rendering and placement of pictures||A|
|PDF to Word Free from NitroPDF||Distinct pictures; nevertheless, typically photographs are hidden behind ‘formatting’ pictures||Right rendering and placement of pictures||A|
|Convert.Information||Distinct photographs; nevertheless, typically photographs are hidden behind ‘formatting’ photographs||Right rendering and placement of photographs||A|
|Zamzar||Photographs lumped into a single background image||n/a (placement irrelevant because it creates a single background picture)||C|
|PDFOnline.com||Distinct, however adjoining photographs are doubtless to be combined together||Right rendering and placement of pictures||A|
|EasyPDF Cloud||Distinct, but adjoining photographs are possible to be combined collectively||Right rendering and placement of pictures||A|
|ConvertOnlineFree.com||Distinct, but adjacent pictures are doubtless to be mixed together||Right rendering and placement of photographs||A|
|ConvertPDFtoWord.internet||Photographs lumped into a single background image||n/a (placement irrelevant because it creates a single background picture)||C|
|Fileminx||Distinct photographs||Low quality. Photographs are typically distorted, and typically sliced into pieces and arduous to use.||C|
|Pdfconverter.com||Distinct pictures||Right rendering and placement of pictures||A|
|Pdfburger||Distinct. If adjacent pictures are mixed together they can be ‘ungrouped’ by proper clicking in Word||Right rendering and placement of photographs||A|
[expand title=”Click to see an in-depth explanation of IMAGE HANDLING evaluation criteria” tag=”h5″ trigclass=”bazinga” swaptitle=”Evaluation Criteria Explained / Image Handling”]Distinct Pictures vs. Lumped together:
- Some converters make it straightforward on themselves: they convert all pictures on the same page into a single picture within the ensuing Word file (together with formatting and so on.) Other converters render distinct pictures that correspond to what you think of as a picture. In the center are converters that have a tendency to lump neighboring pictures collectively into one.
- In case you are going to do some modifying and manipulate the pictures, and so forth. it might clearly be easier to work with distinct pictures from the get-go. Nevertheless, if the pictures are combined collectively you may all the time copy and/or crop them as applicable.
- Importance: we thought this difficulty was reasonably necessary, because as said mixed photographs could be cropped as wanted. Nevertheless, it’s nice to have a conversion that delivers ‘correct’ pictures that don’t require an excessive amount of consumer intervention.
- Examples: click on under to see side-by-side examples of all photographs mixed collectively vs. distinct photographs vs. neighboring pictures grouped collectively. Also an instance of pictures hidden behind other photographs.
Constancy and placement of the resulting pictures: which is to say, the ‘quality’ of the converted picture(s)
- Some photographs are faithfully rendered, while others include artifacts (principally little strains like they have been printed out on a dot matrix printer, but typically main distortions as properly). Lastly, some pictures are broken up into a number of items, which makes them look junky and makes modifying the document or working with those photographs troublesome.
- Placement: in some situations, there are issues with placement. This is a nuisance insofar as the transformed doc won’t seem like the original, particularly if the location of the pictures pushes elements of them off the web page.
- Importance: we thought this concern was reasonably essential, because most issues may be taken care of manually by way of consumer intervention if need be.
- Examples: click under to see examples of appropriately rendered pictures vs. lesser quality photographs featuring artifacts or distortions vs. photographs broken up into a number of elements.
three.4 Desk Dealing with
This is truly simple; tables in the output PDF are either rendered as real tables (i.e. you’ll be able to choose cells in Word and proper click on to see table-specific features resembling merge, insert cells/rows, and so on.) or otherwise simulated or ‘drawn’ using photographs for the formatting and a textual content box or packing containers. That is much less preferable than a actual table in case you are serious about truly getting into and modifying tables or including to their content material, but some instruments do that ‘simulation’ to good effect.
(Precise Desk vs. simulated or ‘drawn’)
|If simulated, how properly?||Rating|
|Examples / Screenshots||Present Me|
|Free PDF to Word Converter from SmartSoft||Simulated||Seems to be good. Properly drawn||B|
|LibreOffice||Simulated||Appears good. Properly drawn -but modifying tables may be troublesome||B|
|OpenOffice with PDF import extension||Simulated||Appears good. Nicely drawn -but modifying tables might be troublesome.||B|
|PDFMate Converter free||Simulated||Not excellent. Textual content and formatting misaligned.||C|
|PDF to Word Free from NitroPDF||Actual Table|
|Zamzar||Simulated||Not excellent. Textual content and formatting misaligned.||C|
|EasyPDF Cloud||Actual Desk|
(with out formatting)
(with out formatting)
|ConvertPDFtoWord.internet||Simulated||Not excellent. Textual content and formatting misaligned.||C|
|Fileminx||Simulated||Not excellent. Textual content misaligned, formatting off.||D|
|Pdfconverter.com||Simulated||Appears good. Nicely drawn||B|
|Pdfburger||Simulated||Seems to be good. Properly drawn||B|
[expand title=”Click to see an in-depth explanation of TABLE HANDLING evaluation criteria” tag=”h5″ trigclass=”bazinga” swaptitle=”Evaluation Criteria Explained / Table Handling”]
We fee table handling across two criteria:
- Desk Rendering (precise table vs. simulated or drawn): if we discovered a ‘real’ table within the ensuing PDF, we gave within the highest score. Sometime we discovered that tables even retain their formatting (i.e. the shading and borders, and so forth.) and that these weren’t re-created using pictures. Regardless, and even when this was not the case, if a actual desk was rendered we gave the very best ‘A’ score).
- If the desk was simulated/recreated, what was the standard?: if the device did not produce a real table we needed to take a look at how properly the table was re-created or drawn. We hoped to see appropriately rendered text that match appropriately inside a re-created simulation of a table/formatting; nevertheless, typically we found problems with misalignment (the place the text was in a single place however the ‘table-like’ formatting was elsewhere).
- Examples: click on under to see side-by-side examples of appropriately rendered tables vs. simulated tables completed nicely vs. simulated tables carried out poorly.
three.5 Reliability and most file sizes
By ‘reliability’ we mean the probability that you need to use the software whenever you want it and give you the chance to convert PDF to Word with out the process breaking down and without having to wait too long to get your converted file(s).
You might have guessed that this problem relates principally to on-line converters, and you’d be (principally) right: what use is a ‘good’ converter if I’m unable to add the information I want? (say, because the servers are sluggish, or as a result of they’ve a very small max file measurement allowance). Or what if the promised emails take hours to arrive or perhaps even days?. Actually, a lot of the instruments that made it on the listing are fairly dependable (we weeded out a few of the worst offenders)
We will even admit a bias towards desktop packages when it comes to reliability, as a result of they’re immediately out there, because usually speaking they are often relied on to convert very giant information with out restrictions, and since they’re probably the most safe since your information are by no means uploaded to a third celebration server.
- We dislike having to wait for the email, for two reasons: first as a result of typically the emails do not come or are very late, leaving the consumer not sure as to whether or not she should take another action or simply wait. The second purpose is that the emails, once they arrive, don’t include your transformed information as attachments but truly ship you back to the location to download your information anyway, which to us seems somewhat, let’s say, ‘unelegant’.
- Significance: despite elevating the difficulty and evaluating the varied online instruments, the e-mail vs. direct hyperlink difficulty shouldn’t be essential at the finish of the day and we did not put a lot of weight on it (particularly as any conversion service that demonstrated a vital delay of multiple hour in remitting emails was excluded from the record to begin with).
Max file measurement
- Our take on that is that a 2 meg max file measurement is just too small. We say this because most of the documents we transformed in the middle of writing this text have been bigger than 2 megs, and we acquired uninterested in splitting and merging them in order to carry out the conversion. Although I’m positive that the individuals behind the web tools will say that 80% or no matter of paperwork they encounter or that folks need to convert are available at 2 megs or beneath, ebooks, commerce brochures, and naturally scanned documents are sometimes a lot larger than this, and we feel that they need to be supported.
- Subsequently, all else being equal, any software that limits processed PDFs to 2 megs or underneath received a (C) rating, whereas any device that supported 10 megs or above acquired an (A) rating. These in between acquired a (B) rating.
- Significance: truly, we feel quite strongly that maximum file sizes must be a minimum of up to 10 megs, and we noticed this criterion as essential.
3.6 OCR Help
OCR (optical character recognition) is essential when your source PDF has been scanned slightly than digitally created. Sometimes, because of this a converter without OCR help thinks that your PDF incorporates pictures moderately than textual content, and will render these photographs as is, such that you simply will be unable to edit the doc (which we assume is the whole level of converting PDF to Word in the first place).
We discussed this difficulty in the ‘important issues and questions’ part above (beneath ‘Will the document be editable once it is converted’. The good news is that with OCR your picture based mostly document might be processed and rendered into editable text. Two on-line conversion tools supply OCR help, and both do a respectable job at it: NuancePDF and Convert.Information. We have been a bit stunned that any free tools truly had OCR help because that is sometimes considered a ‘premium’ function.
OCR Quality: of the two tools mentioned right here, Nuance appeared to provide the better high quality OCR, although each have been good. Observe that we didn’t contemplate OCR in languages aside from English. For more about OCR, we will point you to another article revealed on this website which presents a record of free OCR instruments, with the disclaimer that changing an image doc to textual content could be a labor intensive or concerned process depending on the quality of the source.
4. Eliminated/Excluded Providers
Why this part, you may ask? For the next causes:
- In case you are looking for a software you examine in a earlier model of this article, which can have been eliminated for no matter purpose (sometimes, it’s not free)
- In case you already know of a PDF to Word conversion software that isn’t mentioned in this article; it might have been glossed over for a purpose.
Ideas? Strategies? Questions? Please share them in the feedback section under!